He is also the author of the notes and appendixes of The Companion Bible and the author of numerous works including Commentary on Revelation, Great Cloud of Witnesses, How to Enjoy the Bible, and Number in Scripture. ( Commentaries For Biblical Expositors- Dr. Jim Rosscup ) Hiebert - A thorough exegetical treatment from a dispensational, premillennial, pretribulational viewpoint. Dispensational, Premillennial, Pretribulational Exposition, “Israel and the Church: A Case for Discontinuity,”, California - Do Not Sell My Personal Information. G. K. Beale, New International Greek Testament Commentary (NIGTC), Eerdmans, 1999, 1,309 pp. It is in the NIGTC series, so will require some knowledge of Greek. Dispensational premillennialism offers the most complex chronology of the end times. Rev. All of the twelve, except the Parable of "The Sower," begin with "The Kingdom of Heaven is … Copyright © 2021, Bible Study Tools. Proud member “Pre-tribulational” means that he believes that the church (both living and dead saints) will be raptured to heaven before the seven year Great Tribulation. Yet the place of prophecy in the Word of God and the book of Revelation specifically were seldom, if ever taught. You can find the best commentary on Revelation for you using the tools on the right side. Many of these commentaries are available from Logos Bible Software. Dispensational Premillennialism. Salem Media Group. Ryrie, perhaps best known for the Ryrie Study Bible, has here written a verse-by-verse Revelation commentary noteworthy for being sufficiently detailed and scripturally sound without being too overwhelming for the average layperson. Many Reformed and evangelical scholars argue that Beale has written the best available contemporary commentary on Revelation. About the Contributors. The commentary proper follows the typical style of this series and is quite helpful. This commentary should be on the shelf of every Christian who desires to understand the New Testament and particularly the writings of the Apostle Paul. MISCELLANEOUS DISPENSATIONAL COMMENTARY COLLECTION Book of Revelation (Clarence Larkin), Book of Revelation (James McConkey), The Coming Prince (Robert Anderson), The Coming War and the Rise of Russia (Harry Rimmer), Concise Bible Commentary (James Gray), Daniel and the Latter Day (Robert Culver), Daniel the Prophet (Edward Dennett), The Dawn of the Scarlet Age (Edgar Ainslie), Earth’s Earliest Ages (G.H. John Walvoord – A reliable, straightforward Dispensational commentary which does not interact much with other works. A clearly written, modern commentary on Revelation, Keathley leaves no question unanswered as he ties Revelation, Daniel, Ezekiel, and Matthew together in a dispensational view of the end-times. I would recommend the following to get you started: John MacArthur NT Commentaries on Matthew, Thessalonians, and Revelation; the Bible Knowledge Commentary, John Walvoord has a Revelation commentary, and Thomas' Exegetical Commentary on Revelation. The book table at the church featured books by authors such as David Chilton and embraced both Dominion Theology and Replacement Theology. Nevertheless, there are some great commentaries available. 1Ti. All are premillenial and dispensational and have aided me greatly. For those interested in a recent, popular, readable commentary on Revelation from a pretribulational and premillennial point of view, Patterson’s volume may be the best available. The reader should know that this commentary is written from the perspective of a dispensational, premillennial, and pretribulational view of Scripture as we believe that this is what God’s Word teaches when rightly interpreted. It is a contemporary church issues research library, a preacher’s information database, a Baptist history library, a Bible Version library, a library of dispensational Bible commentaries, and much more. Absolutely, Thomas is good and a classic dispensationalism. : Literal Commentary and Study Guide on the Book of Revelation, The Revelation of John: A Narrative Commentary, Reversed Thunder: The Revelation of John and the Praying Imagination, Revelation: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition, The Letters of St. Paul to the Galatians & Ephesians: Commentary, Notes and Study Questions, A Complete Handbook of Literary Forms in the Bible, Social-Science Commentary on the Book of Revelation, Exploring the New Testament. 20:1+). … While it is undeniable that one great purpose of the book of Revelation is to inspire the saints of all ages, especially those in times of intense persecution, this is not the only or even primary purpose of the book. Having believed it was written primarily for first-century believers describing political events of their day, all fulfilled by the hyperbolic language thought to be found in the book, the book was relegated to serving as a devotional text for Christian living. Thomas, Robert L. Revelation 1-7: An Exegetical Commentary, Revelation 8-12: An Exegetical Commentary. In 1862 he was ordained in the Church of England. 19:1+-Rev. Hb. Having a better grasp of the issues and interpretive systems involved, we now understand that the book of Revelation was seen as having already passed its point of relevance. 4:3. Commentaries on Revelation that reflect the theology of premillennialism are listed below. Free eBook: Getting Through the Storms in Life, “show His servants things which must shortly take place”, 2.11. William Newell is best remembered for his outstanding exposition of Paul's letter to Rome--Romans, Verse by Verse. Four Commentaries on Revelation: Thomas (WEC); Beale (NIGTC); Leithart (ITC); Osborne (BECNT) December 29, 2018 by Brian. Seven of the "Kingdom of Heaven" Parables are found in Matthew 13. How are His servants to know when the results of non-literal interpretation abound in variety of meaning? The Jewish nation, while being perfectly able to join the church in the belief of a true faith in Christ, has no distinct redemptive plan as they would in the dispensational perspective. The term “preterism” is based on the Latin preter, which means “past.”Preterism understands certain eschatological passages which are yet future as having already been fulfilled.All biblical interpreters understand that certain prophecies have been fulfilled, but preterists differ in that they interpret a greater portion of Scripture as already having come to pass. This is an important connection in Dispensational thought and is believed to cleanly separate the Rapture in Revelation 12:5 from the Ascension. Walvoord is the closest one I can think of, but that book is fifty years old now! Walvood wrote a 320 page commentary on Daniel (9780802417534) and a 350 page commentary on Revelation (9780802473097). Engaging important questions concerning the interpretation of Revelation in scholarship today, as well interacting with the various viewpoints scholars hold on these issues, Beale's work makes a major contribution in the much-debated area of how the Old Testament is used in the Apocalypse. Some favor the broad vistas of devotional creativity and alternative understandings which result from non-literal interpretation. It is the best broad dispensational work to appear in recent years, and Robert Thomas has the best detailed technical work so far. Revelation. Edited by Kenneth Barker. Rom. Reading Revelation for the first time, the imagery brings fantastic pictures to mind; but as you grow in understanding of the entire scope of the Bible more of the scenes of Revelation become recognizable, even familiar. The variety of results evidenced by non-literal interpretation serve as strong evidence against its suitability for the purpose stated by God.4. Published: 2005. The duration of the millennial kingdom (Revelation 20:1-6) is unsure: literal or metaphorical. This book is a commentary on the Book of Revelation, written on a popular level yet influenced by scholarship. 65:25; Rom. Walvoord was a top prophecy scholar. 623 pp. Beale's commentary is the place to turn for insight on the many Old Testament allusions and echoes in the book of Revelation. Premillennial Commentaries on Revelation. Rev. For readers with a mindset to study but little or no background in Revelation, I recommend this solid commentary. Still, when you talk about what you really need to learn in an exegetical commentary you will find it all here in spades. 12:15; Isa. There really isn’t another full scale commentary on Revelation from a disp available. The reader should know that this commentary is written from the perspective of a dispensational, premillennial, and pretribulational view of Scripture as we believe that this is what God’s Word teaches when rightly interpreted.. By way of background, let us state that we came to salvation and spent the first five years of our Christian walk in a church which endorsed preterism. Reviews and ratings of Biblical, theological, and practical Christian works. It has been our observation since that time that many who are trained to observe details and integrate the teachings of Scripture into a self-consistent whole wind up in the dispensational, premillennial camp.1 Not because we hold this a priori understanding, but because the Scriptures, when interpreted in a consistently literal way where figures of speech and symbols are duly recognized as such and handled in their normative fashion, evidence differences in the requirements which God prescribes to different groups at different times.2 For example, Scripture maintains a consistent distinction between the role of the nation Israel and the Church, 3 and sets forth Jesus as returning prior to the Millennium (Rev. Clarence Larkin's Bible Commentaries. The end of the book gives a nice summary of the theology of Revelation too. Peter Steveson – A very worthwhile effort from a conservative Dispensational scholar, with good word studies. Theological Position: Protestant Dispensationalism The Book of Daniel is his companion commentary published posthumously ten years later in 1929. Ryrie’s perspective is pre-tribulational and pre-millennial. CLICK HERE FOR RESOURCES: Hi, I'm Dr Gene Kim (UC Berkeley & PBI) and I pastor a church at San Jose Bible Baptist Church. 3 “Of the twenty-seven uses in the Gospel of Luke and Acts, Jervell concludes: ‘In Luke’s writings Israel always refers to the Jewish people. At no time does it serve to characterize the church, i.e., it is never used as a technical term for the Christian gathering of Jews and Gentiles.’ ”—Robert L. Saucy, “Israel and the Church: A Case for Discontinuity,” in John S. Feinberg, ed., Continuity And Discontinuity (Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1988), 245. Author: John Jeske. Add available commentaries to your library with discount, Controller: 00:00:00.0619902 ; View: 00:00:03.2969179 ; Template: 00:00:00.0312497, Marshall, I. Howard; Travis, Stephen H.; Paul, Ian.